view in publisher's site

Improving flood hazard prediction models

ABSTRACTInaccurate components of hydrodynamic models can lead to inaccurate flood hazard simulations, particularly when models are applied to floods larger than the model calibration conditions, yet hazard information is usually sought for events which are more extreme than those documented by accurate historical measurements. Model components subject to error include the input hydrographs (and their exceedance probabilities), input roughness maps, representations of topography, bathymetry, the numerical solver and the model flow resistance equation. There is particular uncertainty surrounding the treatment of roughness and flow resistance in 2D flood models. Such models typically have low-resolution mapping of roughness compared to the mapping of topography. Significant areas with high roughness and low flow depth can occur with flood rise and fall, particularly with ‘direct rainfall’ models. Conventional flow resistance equations break down under these high relative roughness conditions. The formulation of friction within a hydrodynamic model code and derivation of depth-averaged flow resistance equations for 2D models are investigated. This study gives recommendations for improved mapping of roughness, new equations for better representing flow resistance in the modelling code, a nomograph for converting the more common ‘n’ roughness values to ‘Zo’ roughness values and makes suggestions for better communication of model results.

بهبود مدل‌های پیش‌بینی خطر سیل

ترجمه شده با

پر ارجاع‌ترین مقالات مرتبط:

  • مقاله Water Science and Technology
  • ترجمه مقاله Water Science and Technology
  • مقاله علوم و فن‌آوری آب
  • ترجمه مقاله علوم و فن‌آوری آب
سفارش ترجمه مقاله و کتاب - شروع کنید

95/12/18 - با استفاده از افزونه دانلود فایرفاکس و کروم٬ چکیده مقالات به صورت خودکار تشخیص داده شده و دکمه دانلود فری‌پیپر در صفحه چکیده نمایش داده می شود.